False outliers of the Ep,i - Eiso correlation?

TL;DR

This study investigates whether observational biases caused by detector limitations can explain why certain gamma-ray bursts appear as outliers in the Ep,i-Eiso correlation, suggesting some outliers may be due to instrumental effects rather than intrinsic differences.

Contribution

The paper demonstrates that the apparent outliers in the Ep,i-Eiso correlation could be artifacts of detector sensitivity, highlighting the importance of considering observational biases in GRB studies.

Findings

Simulated observations show some GRBs would appear as outliers with old detectors.

Swift observations would align certain GRBs with the Ep,i-Eiso correlation.

Instrumental biases can cause some GRBs to appear as outliers.

Abstract

Context. In the context of an in-depth understanding of GRBs and their possible use in cosmology, some important correlations between the parameters that describe their emission have been discovered, among which the "Ep,i-Eiso" correlation is the most studied. Because of this, it is fundamental to shed light on the peculiar behaviour of a few events, namely GRB 980425 and GRB 031203, that appear to be important outliers of the Ep,i-Eiso correlation. Aims. In this paper we investigate if the locations of GRB 980425 and GRB 031203, the two (apparent) outliers of the correlation, may be due to an observational bias caused by the lacking detection of the soft X-ray emissions associated with these GRBs, from respectively the BATSE detector on-board the Compton Gamma-Ray Observer and INTEGRAL, that were operating at the epoch of the observations. We analyse the observed emission of other similar sub-energetic bursts (GRBs 060218, 100316D and 161219B) observed by Swift and whose integrated emissions match the Ep,i-Eiso relation. We simulate their integrated and time-resolved emissions as would have been observed by the same detectors that observed GRB 980425 and GRB 031203, aimed at reconstructing the light curve and spectra of these bursts. Results. If observed by old generation instruments, GRB 060218, 100316D and 161219B would appear as outliers of the Ep,i-Eiso relation, while if observed with Swift or WFM GRB 060218 would perfectly match the correlation. We also note that the instrument BAT alone (15-150 keV) actually measured 060218 as an outlier. Conclusions. We suggest that if GRB 980425 and GRB 031203 would have been observed by Swift and by eXTP they may have matched the Ep,i-Eiso relation. This provides strong support to the idea that instrumental biases can make some events in the lower-left corner of the Ep,i-Eiso plane appearing as outliers of the "Amati relation".