Attention but not musical training affects auditory streaming
Sarah A. Sauv\'e, Marcus T. Pearce

TL;DR
This study investigates whether instrument-specific musical training influences auditory streaming and grouping, finding that attention, not musical training, affects auditory scene processing.
Contribution
It provides evidence that instrument-specific training does not impact auditory grouping, emphasizing the role of attention over musical expertise.
Findings
Instrument-specific training does not affect auditory grouping.
Perception of static sequences is influenced by timbre similarity.
Attention, not musical training, governs auditory scene analysis.
Abstract
While musicians generally perform better than non-musicians in various auditory discrimination tasks, effects of specific instrumental training have received little attention. The effects of instrument-specific musical training on auditory grouping in the context of stream segregation are investigated here in three experiments. In Experiment 1a, participants listened to sequences of ABA tones and indicated when they heard a change in rhythm. This change is caused by the manipulation of the B tones' timbre and indexes a change in perception from integration to segregation, or vice versa. While it was expected that musicians would detect a change in rhythm earlier when their own instrument was involved, no such pattern was observed. In Experiment 1b, designed to control for potential expectation effects in Experiment 1a, participants heard sequences of static ABA tones and reported their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeuroscience and Music Perception · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Neural dynamics and brain function
