Goldman-Turaev formality from the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection

TL;DR

This paper provides an elementary proof of the isomorphism between Goldman-Turaev Lie bialgebra structures and their graded counterparts for genus zero surfaces, using the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection.

Contribution

It introduces a new elementary proof of the Goldman-Turaev formality in genus zero using the KZ connection, simplifying previous approaches.

Findings

Elementary proof of Goldman-Turaev isomorphism using KZ connection

Proof applies to both Lie brackets and cobrackets

Simplifies previous complex methods

Abstract

For an oriented 2-dimensional manifold $\Sigma$ of genus $g$ with $n$ boundary components the space $\mathbb{C}\pi_1(\Sigma)/[\mathbb{C}\pi_1(\Sigma), \mathbb{C}\pi_1(\Sigma)]$ carries the Goldman-Turaev Lie bialgebra structure defined in terms of intersections and self-intersections of curves. Its associated graded (under the natural filtration) is described by cyclic words in $H_1(\Sigma)$ and carries the structure of a necklace Schedler Lie bialgebra. The isomorphism between these two structures in genus zero has been established in [G. Massuyeau, Formal descriptions of Turaev's loop operations] using Kontsevich integrals and in [A. Alekseev, N. Kawazumi, Y. Kuno and F. Naef, The Goldman-Turaev Lie bialgebra in genus zero and the Kashiwara-Vergne problem] using solutions of the Kashiwara-Vergne problem. In this note we give an elementary proof of this isomorphism over $\mathbb{C}$. It uses the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection on $\mathbb{C}\backslash\{ z_1, \dots z_n\}$. The proof of the isomorphism for Lie brackets is a version of the classical result by Hitchin. Surprisingly, it turns out that a similar proof applies to cobrackets.