Validation of Radiative Transfer Computation with Monte Carlo Method for Ultra-Relativistic Background Flow
Ayako Ishii, Naofumi Ohnishi, Hiroki Nagakura, Hirotaka Ito, Shoichi, Yamada

TL;DR
This paper presents a validated Monte Carlo radiative transfer code for ultra-relativistic flows in gamma-ray burst models, demonstrating accurate spectrum and angular distribution predictions under various conditions.
Contribution
The authors developed and validated a 3D Monte Carlo radiative transfer code for ultra-relativistic flows, enabling reliable simulations of GRB emission with detailed shock and flow structure considerations.
Findings
Angular distribution and spectrum are consistent across inertial frames.
Convergence achieved when flow updates resolve photon mean free path into ten steps.
High-energy photon production depends on shock front sharpness and optical depth.
Abstract
We developed a three-dimensional radiative transfer code for an ultra-relativistic background flow-field by using the Monte Carlo (MC) method in the context of gamma-ray burst (GRB) emission. For obtaining reliable simulation results in the coupled computation of MC radiation transport with relativistic hydrodynamics which can reproduce GRB emission, we validated radiative transfer computation in the ultra-relativistic regime and assessed the appropriate simulation conditions. The radiative transfer code was validated through two test calculations: (1) computing in different inertial frames and (2) computing in flow-fields with discontinuous and smeared shock fronts. The simulation results of the angular distribution and spectrum were compared among three different inertial frames and in good agreement with each other. If the time duration for updating the flow-field was sufficiently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
