Infection-acquired versus vaccine-acquired immunity in an SIRWS model
Tiffany Leung, Barry D Hughes, Federico Frascoli, Patricia T Campbell,, James M McCaw

TL;DR
This study models the effects of differing durations of infection- and vaccine-acquired immunity on disease dynamics, revealing complex patterns like cyclic behavior and emphasizing the importance of understanding immunity duration for vaccination strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel SIRWS model that differentiates between infection- and vaccine-acquired immunity durations, analyzing their impact on disease prevalence and epidemic cycles.
Findings
Vaccination can induce cyclic disease behavior.
Longer immunity durations reduce infection prevalence.
Higher vaccine coverage can increase transmission but lower primary infections.
Abstract
Despite high vaccine coverage, pertussis has re-emerged as a public health concern in many countries. One hypothesis posed for re-emergence is the waning of immunity. In some disease systems, the process of waning immunity can be non-linear, involving a complex relationship between the duration of immunity and subsequent boosting of immunity through asymptomatic re-exposure. We present and analyse a model of infectious disease transmission to examine the interplay between infection and immunity. By allowing the duration of infection-acquired immunity to differ from that of vaccine-acquired immunity, we explore the impact of the difference in durations on long-term disease patterns and prevalence of infection. Our model demonstrates that vaccination may induce cyclic behaviour, and its ability to reduce the infection prevalence increases with both the duration of infection-acquired…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
