On almost-equidistant sets - II
Alexandr Polyanskii

TL;DR
This paper investigates the maximum size of almost-equidistant point sets in Euclidean space, providing new bounds and simplified proofs for existing results, especially under specific geometric constraints.
Contribution
It offers a shorter proof of a known bound for sets on spheres, establishes new linear bounds under diameter and radius constraints, and presents a novel proof for an existing polynomial bound.
Findings
Sets on spheres of radius less than 1/√2 have at most 2d+2 points.
Almost-equidistant sets with diameter ≤ 1 have O(d) points.
Sets within certain radius bounds have O(d) points.
Abstract
A set in is called almost-equidistant if for any three distinct points in the set, some two are at unit distance apart. First, we give a short proof of the result of Bezdek and L\'angi claiming that an almost-equidistant set lying on a -dimensional sphere of radius , where , has at most points. Second, we prove that an almost-equidistant set in has points in two cases: if the diameter of is at most or if is a subset of a -dimensional ball of radius at most , where . Also, we present a new proof of the result of Kupavskii, Mustafa and Swanepoel arXiv:1708.01590 that an almost-equidistant set in has elements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
