Comparative analysis of magnetic resonance in the polaron pair recombination and the triplet exciton-polaron quenching models
V. V. Mkhitaryan, D. Danilovi\`c, C. Hippola, M. E. Raikh, and J., Shinar

TL;DR
This study compares magnetic resonance models in conjugated materials, revealing distinct lineshape behaviors and power dependencies, which can help experimentally distinguish between the polaron pair recombination and triplet exciton-polaron quenching mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides a detailed theoretical comparison of the PPR and TPQ models, highlighting their different resonance lineshapes, power dependencies, and underlying spin dynamics, aiding experimental discrimination.
Findings
PPR model shows lineshape evolution from positive to negative with increasing microwave power.
TPQ model exhibits a monotonic saturation with positive resonance lineshape.
Resonance amplitude scales as P_L in PPR and as P_L^2 to P_L^3 in TPQ.
Abstract
We present a comparative theoretical study of magnetic resonance within the polaron pair recombination (PPR) and the triplet exciton-polaron quenching (TPQ) models. Both models have been invoked to interpret the photoluminescence detected magnetic resonance (PLDMR) in -conjugated materials. We show that resonance lineshapes calculated within the two models differ dramatically in several regards. First, in the PPR model, the lineshape exhibits unusual behavior upon increasing the microwave power: it evolves from fully positive at weak power to fully negative at strong power. In contrast, in the TPQ model, the PLDMR is completely positive, showing a monotonic saturation. Second, the two models predict different dependencies of the resonance signal on the photoexcitation power, . At low , the resonance amplitude is in the PPR model, while it is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
