Topological defects govern crack front motion and facet formation on broken surfaces
Itamar Kolvin, Gil Cohen, Jay Fineberg

TL;DR
This paper reveals that topological defects in crack fronts, specifically steps, are key to understanding the formation of facets and patterns on fractured surfaces, linking 3D topology to 2D fracture dynamics.
Contribution
It demonstrates that steps are topological defects in crack fronts, explaining their stability, motion, and role in surface pattern formation during fracture.
Findings
Steps are topological defects that stabilize facet formation.
Crack front segments overlap, enabling step stability.
Step dynamics are coupled to local dissipation and crack front deformation.
Abstract
Patterns on broken surfaces are well-known from everyday experience, but surprisingly, how and why they form are very much open questions. Well-defined facets are commonly observed1-4 along fracture surfaces which are created by slow tensile cracks. As facets appear in amorphous materials5-7, their formation does not reflect microscopic order. Fracture mechanics, however, predict that slow crack fronts should be straight, creating mirror-like surfaces8-13. In contrast, facet-forming fronts propagate simultaneously within different planes separated by steps. It is therefore unclear why steps are stable, what determines their path and how they couple to crack front dynamics. Here we show, by integrating real-time imaging of propagating crack fronts with surface measurements, that steps are topological defects of crack fronts; crack front separation into discontinuous overlapping segments…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
