Self-compensation in phosphorus-doped CdTe
Mauricio A. Flores, Walter Orellana, and Eduardo Men\'endez-Proupin

TL;DR
This study uses first-principles calculations to analyze self-compensation mechanisms in phosphorus-doped CdTe, revealing that AX centers are not responsible and identifying the roles of P interstitials and complexes under different growth conditions.
Contribution
The paper provides new insights into the defect formation energies and mechanisms of self-compensation in P-doped CdTe, challenging previous assumptions about AX centers.
Findings
P interstitials act as compensating donors under Te-rich conditions.
Self-compensation is not caused by AX centers formation.
P-doping limits are influenced by P-Te-V_Te complexes in Cd-rich conditions.
Abstract
We investigate the self-compensation mechanism in phosphorus-doped CdTe. The formation energies, charge transition levels, and defects states of several P-related point defects susceptible to cause self-compensation are addressed by first-principles calculations. Moreover, we assess the in uence of the spin-orbit coupling and supercell-size effects on the stability of AX centers donors, which are believed to be responsible for most of the self-compensation. We report an improved result for the lowest-energy configuration of the P interstitial (P) and find that the self-compensation mechanism is not due to the formation of AX centers. Under Te-rich growth conditions, (P) exhibits a formation energy lower than the substitutional acceptor (P) when the Fermi level is near the valence band, acting as compensating donor. While, for Cd-rich growth conditions,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
