From K giants to G dwarfs: stellar lifetime effects on metallicity distributions derived from red giants
Ellen M. Manning, Andrew A. Cole

TL;DR
This paper investigates biases in metallicity distributions derived from red giant branch stars, showing that certain populations are over- or under-represented, and provides correction methods to improve chemical evolution modeling.
Contribution
It introduces correction factors for RGB-based metallicity distributions, accounting for stellar lifetime effects across different ages and metallicities.
Findings
RGB samples over-represent intermediate-age populations (~1-4 Gyr).
Metallicity distribution functions from RGB stars underestimate metal-poor stars by over 25%.
Correcting for biases affects interpretations of galaxy chemical evolution.
Abstract
We examine the biases inherent to chemical abundance distributions when targets are selected from the red giant branch (RGB), using simulated giant branches created from isochrones. We find that even when stars are chosen from the entire colour range of RGB stars and over a broad range of magnitudes, the relative numbers of stars of different ages and metallicities, integrated over all stellar types, are not accurately represented in the giant branch sample. The result is that metallicity distribution functions derived from RGB star samples require a correction before they can be fit by chemical evolution models. We derive simple correction factors for over- and under-represented populations for the limiting cases of single-age populations with a broad range of metallicities and of continuous star formation at constant metallicity; an important general conclusion is that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
