Light curves of hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory
Annalisa De Cia, A. Gal-Yam, A. Rubin, G. Leloudas, P. Vreeswijk, D., A. Perley, R. Quimby, Lin Yan, M. Sullivan, A. Fl\"ors, J. Sollerman, D., Bersier, S. B. Cenko, M. Gal-Yam, K. Maguire, E. O. Ofek, S. Prentice, S., Schulze, J. Spyromilio, S. Valenti, I. Arcavi, A. Corsi

TL;DR
This study analyzes the light-curve properties of 26 hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory, revealing their distinct photometric features, decay behaviors, and potential powering mechanisms, with implications for their use in cosmology.
Contribution
First comprehensive analysis of SLSNe-I light curves from PTF, demonstrating their unique photometric properties and evaluating models for their luminosity sources.
Findings
SLSNe-I are brighter and have longer rise times than normal SNe Ib/c.
Late-time light curves are consistent with radioactive decay or magnetar models.
Sample analysis does not support SLSNe-I as reliable cosmological distance indicators.
Abstract
We investigate the light-curve properties of a sample of 26 spectroscopically confirmed hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae (SLSNe-I) in the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) survey. These events are brighter than SNe Ib/c and SNe Ic-BL, on average, by about 4 and 2~mag, respectively. The peak absolute magnitudes of SLSNe-I in rest-frame band span ~mag, and these peaks are not powered by radioactive Ni, unless strong asymmetries are at play. The rise timescales are longer for SLSNe than for normal SNe Ib/c, by roughly 10 days, for events with similar decay times. Thus, SLSNe-I can be considered as a separate population based on photometric properties. After peak, SLSNe-I decay with a wide range of slopes, with no obvious gap between rapidly declining and slowly declining events. The latter events show more irregularities (bumps) in the light…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
