Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues
J. Zuntz, E. Sheldon, S. Samuroff, M. A. Troxel, M. Jarvis, N., MacCrann, D. Gruen, J. Prat, C. S\'anchez, A. Choi, S. L. Bridle, G. M., Bernstein, S. Dodelson, A. Drlica-Wagner, Y. Fang, R. A. Gruendl, B. Hoyle,, E. M. Huff, B. Jain, D. Kirk, T. Kacprzak, C. Krawiec

TL;DR
This paper presents two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data, using two independent shear measurement pipelines, demonstrating their suitability for weak lensing analysis.
Contribution
Introduction of two new galaxy shape catalogues with innovative calibration methods from DES Year 1 data, enabling improved weak lensing studies.
Findings
Catalogues contain 34.8 million and 21.9 million objects.
Both catalogues pass null tests confirming data quality.
Estimated shear calibration uncertainties are 0.013 and 0.025.
Abstract
We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of . The catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied to -bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses a maximum-likelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was applied to -band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science. We estimate the 1 uncertainties in multiplicative shear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
