Improved Time-Space Trade-offs for Computing Voronoi Diagrams
Bahareh Banyassady, Matias Korman, Wolfgang Mulzer, Andr\'e van, Renssen, Marcel Roeloffzen, Paul Seiferth, Yannik Stein

TL;DR
This paper presents new deterministic and expected time algorithms for computing various types of Voronoi diagrams with limited workspace, improving efficiency and simplicity over previous methods.
Contribution
It introduces simple, deterministic, and expected-time algorithms for computing Voronoi diagrams with limited workspace, extending to higher-order diagrams.
Findings
Deterministic $s$-workspace algorithm for NVD and FVD in $O((n^2/s) \, \log s)$ time.
Expected-time algorithm for higher-order diagrams with total time $O(\frac{n^2 K^5}{s}(\log s + K 2^{O(\log^* K)}))$.
Simpler approach without advanced data structures or random sampling.
Abstract
Let be a planar set of sites in general position. For , the Voronoi diagram of order for is obtained by subdividing the plane into cells such that points in the same cell have the same set of nearest neighbors in . The (nearest site) Voronoi diagram (NVD) and the farthest site Voronoi diagram (FVD) are the particular cases of and , respectively. For any given , the family of all higher-order Voronoi diagrams of order for can be computed in total time using space [Aggarwal et al., DCG'89; Lee, TC'82]. Moreover, NVD and FVD for can be computed in time using space [Preparata, Shamos, Springer'85]. For , an -workspace algorithm has random access to a read-only array with the sites of in arbitrary order.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
