Fully device independent Conference Key Agreement
J\'er\'emy Ribeiro, Gl\'aucia Murta, and Stephanie Wehner

TL;DR
This paper introduces a fully device-independent conference key agreement protocol based on Bell tests, specifically using the Parity-CHSH inequality, and demonstrates its advantages over multiple DIQKD protocols in certain noise regimes.
Contribution
It provides the first security analysis of device-independent conference key agreement using the Parity-CHSH inequality, connecting it to the CHSH inequality and comparing key rates.
Findings
Security can be achieved for any violation of the Parity-CHSH inequality.
The DICKA protocol can outperform multiple DIQKD protocols in some noise conditions.
The protocol is implementable with current Bell test setups.
Abstract
We present the first security analysis of conference key agreement (CKA) in the most adversarial model of device independence (DI). Our protocol can be implemented {by any experimental setup} that is capable of performing Bell tests (specifically, we introduce the "Parity-CHSH" inequality), and security can in principle be obtained for any violation of the Parity-CHSH inequality. We use a direct connection between the -partite Parity-CHSH inequality and the CHSH inequality. Namely, the Parity-CHSH inequality can be considered as a CHSH inequality or another CHSH inequality (equivalent up to relabelling) depending on the parity of the output of of the parties. We compare the asymptotic key rate for DICKA to the case where the parties use DIQKD protocols in order to generate a common key. We show that for some regime of noise the DICKA protocol leads to better rates.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
