Reframing Societal Discourse as Requirements Negotiation: Vision Statement
Kurt Schneider, Oliver Karras, Anne Finger, and Barbara Zibell

TL;DR
This paper proposes reframing spatial planning discourse as a requirements engineering process, utilizing CrowdRE and video communication to involve diverse stakeholders and improve participatory decision-making.
Contribution
It introduces a novel perspective of viewing spatial planning challenges as requirements problems, applying requirements engineering and video tools for stakeholder engagement.
Findings
Reframing discourse as requirements engineering enhances stakeholder involvement.
Video communication effectively conveys complex spatial planning issues.
CrowdRE techniques facilitate inclusive participation among heterogeneous groups.
Abstract
Challenges in spatial planning include adjusting settlement patterns to increasing or shrinking populations; it also includes organizing food delivery in rural and peripheral environments. Discourse typically starts with an open problem and the search for a holistic and innovative solution. Software will often be needed to implement the innovation. Spatial planning problems are characterized by large and heterogeneous groups of stakeholders, such as municipalities, companies, interest groups, citizens, women and men, young people and children. Current techniques for participation are slow, laborious and costly, and they tend to miss out on many stakeholders or interest groups. We propose a triple shift in perspective: (1) Discourse is reframed as a requirements process with the explicit goal to state software, hardware, and organizational requirements. (2) Due to the above-mentioned…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
