Sensitivity of the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array and its Build-out Stages to One-point Statistics from Redshifted 21 cm Observations
Piyanat Kittiwisit (1), Judd D. Bowman (1), Daniel C. Jacobs (1), Adam, P. Beardsley (1), Nithyanandan Thyagarajan (1, 2) ((1) School of Earth, and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ (2) National Radio, Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM)

TL;DR
This study assesses HERA's ability to detect one-point statistics of 21 cm signals from the Epoch of Reionization, showing high sensitivity for variance and potential for skewness and kurtosis detection, with implications for understanding reionization structures.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive sensitivity analysis of HERA and its build-out stages for one-point statistics, incorporating realistic models and measurement schemes, highlighting detection capabilities and limitations.
Findings
HERA can detect variance across all build-out stages.
Skewness and kurtosis are detectable for HERA128 and larger.
Sample variance limits variance measurement, while thermal noise affects skewness and kurtosis.
Abstract
We present a baseline sensitivity analysis of the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA) and its build-out stages to one-point statistics (variance, skewness, and kurtosis) of redshifted 21 cm intensity fluctuation from the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) based on realistic mock observations. By developing a full-sky 21 cm lightcone model, taking into account the proper field of view and frequency bandwidth, utilising a realistic measurement scheme, and assuming perfect foreground removal, we show that HERA will be able to recover statistics of the sky model with high sensitivity by averaging over measurements from multiple fields. All build-out stages will be able to detect variance, while skewness and kurtosis should be detectable for HERA128 and larger. We identify sample variance as the limiting constraint of the variance measurement while skewness and kurtosis measurements will be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
