Searching for Cool Dust: II. Infrared Imaging of the OH/IR Supergiants, NML Cyg, VX Sgr, S Per and the Normal Red Supergiants RS Per and T Per
Michael S. Gordon, Roberta M. Humphreys, Terry J. Jones, Dinesh, Shenoy, Robert D. Gehrz, L. Andrew Helton, Massimo Marengo, Philip M. Hinz,, William F. Hoffman

TL;DR
This study uses infrared imaging and radiative transfer modeling to analyze the dust and mass-loss histories of both OH/IR and normal red supergiants, revealing variability in mass-loss rates among these stars.
Contribution
It provides new infrared observations and detailed modeling that challenge the assumption of constant mass-loss rates in red supergiants.
Findings
Constant mass-loss rates cannot explain observed IR emission.
Some supergiants show evidence of variable, high mass-loss events.
Others have maintained constant mass loss over thousands of years.
Abstract
New MMT/MIRAC (9-11 {\mu}m), SOFIA/FORCAST (11-37 {\mu}m), and Herschel/PACS (70 and 160 {\mu}m) infrared (IR) imaging and photometry is presented for three famous OH/IR red supergiants (NML Cyg, VX Sgr, and S Per) and two normal red supergiants (RS Per and T Per). We model the observed spectral energy distributions (SEDs) using radiative transfer code DUSTY. Azimuthal average profiles from the SOFIA/FORCAST imaging, in addition to dust mass distribution profiles from DUSTY, constrain the mass-loss histories of these supergiants. For all of our observed supergiants, the DUSTY models suggest that constant mass-loss rates do not produce enough dust to explain the observed infrared emission in the stars' SEDs. Combining our results with Shenoy et al. (2016) (Paper I) we find mixed results with some red supergiants showing evidence for variable and high mass-loss events while others have…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
