TL;DR
This study uses Subaru Telescope data to test for variations in the fine-structure constant across the sky, finding no significant evidence for such variations within measurement uncertainties.
Contribution
It provides a more reliable, supercalibrated measurement of $ abla ext{alpha}$ variations, reducing systematic errors compared to previous studies.
Findings
No evidence for $ ext{alpha}$ variation within uncertainties
Results are consistent with a constant $ ext{alpha}$ across the sky
Systematic effects dominate the error budget
Abstract
Previous, large samples of quasar absorption spectra have indicated some evidence for relative variations in the fine-structure constant () across the sky. However, they were likely affected by long-range distortions of the wavelength calibration, so it is important to establish a statistical sample of more reliable results, from multiple telescopes. Here we triple the sample of measurements from the Subaru Telescope which have been `supercalibrated' to correct for long-range distortions. A blinded analysis of the metallic ions in 6 intervening absorption systems in two Subaru quasar spectra provides no evidence for variation, with a weighted mean of parts per million (1 statistical and systematic uncertainties). The main remaining systematic effects are uncertainties…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
