Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-$K$ Ranking
Yuxin Chen, Jianqing Fan, Cong Ma, Kaizheng Wang

TL;DR
This paper proves that both spectral methods and regularized MLE are minimax optimal for exact top-$K$ ranking in pairwise comparison models, supported by theoretical analysis and numerical experiments.
Contribution
It establishes the minimax optimality of spectral and MLE methods for top-$K$ ranking under a natural sampling model, using novel leave-one-out analysis.
Findings
Both methods achieve minimax optimal sample complexity.
Numerical experiments confirm low entrywise score estimation errors.
A new eigenvector perturbation bound is derived.
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the problem of top- ranking from pairwise comparisons. Given a collection of items and a few pairwise comparisons across them, one wishes to identify the set of items that receive the highest ranks. To tackle this problem, we adopt the logistic parametric model --- the Bradley-Terry-Luce model, where each item is assigned a latent preference score, and where the outcome of each pairwise comparison depends solely on the relative scores of the two items involved. Recent works have made significant progress towards characterizing the performance (e.g. the mean square error for estimating the scores) of several classical methods, including the spectral method and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). However, where they stand regarding top- ranking remains unsettled. We demonstrate that under a natural random sampling model, the spectral method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
