Performance of shortcut-to-adiabaticity quantum engines
Obinna Abah, Eric Lutz

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the performance of a quantum harmonic Otto engine using shortcut-to-adiabaticity techniques, showing that these methods enhance efficiency and power in finite-time cycles.
Contribution
It compares three shortcut-to-adiabaticity methods, demonstrating their effectiveness in improving quantum engine performance over traditional approaches.
Findings
All three shortcut methods increase efficiency and power in fast cycles.
Shortcut techniques outperform traditional heat engines.
Energetic costs of shortcuts are explicitly considered.
Abstract
We consider a paradigmatic quantum harmonic Otto engine operating in finite time. We investigate its performance when shortcut-to-adiabaticity techniques are used to speed up its cycle. We compute efficiency and power by taking the energetic cost of the shortcut driving explicitly into account. We analyze in detail three different shortcut methods, counterdiabatic driving, local counterdiabatic driving and inverse engineering. We demonstrate that all three lead to a simultaneous increase of efficiency and power for fast cycles, thus outperforming traditional heat engines.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
