Empirical Bayes Estimators for High-Dimensional Sparse Vectors
Pavan Srinath, Ramji Venkataramanan

TL;DR
This paper introduces an empirical Bayes estimator for high-dimensional sparse vectors, compares it with soft-thresholding, and proposes a hybrid approach that adaptively chooses the better estimator, demonstrating improved performance in compressed sensing applications.
Contribution
The paper develops a new empirical Bayes shrinkage estimator for sparse vectors, analyzes its risk concentration, and introduces a hybrid estimator that adaptively combines it with soft-thresholding for enhanced performance.
Findings
Both estimators' risks concentrate around true risk for large n.
The hybrid estimator's loss approximates the minimum of the two estimators' losses.
Using the estimators in AMP improves compressed sensing denoising performance.
Abstract
The problem of estimating a high-dimensional sparse vector from an observation in i.i.d. Gaussian noise is considered. The performance is measured using squared-error loss. An empirical Bayes shrinkage estimator, derived using a Bernoulli-Gaussian prior, is analyzed and compared with the well-known soft-thresholding estimator. We obtain concentration inequalities for the Stein's unbiased risk estimate and the loss function of both estimators. The results show that for large , both the risk estimate and the loss function concentrate on deterministic values close to the true risk. Depending on the underlying , either the proposed empirical Bayes (eBayes) estimator or soft-thresholding may have smaller loss. We consider a hybrid estimator that attempts to pick the better of the soft-thresholding estimator and the eBayes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
