Planar graphs as L-intersection or L-contact graphs
Daniel Gon\c{c}alves (ALGCO), Lucas Isenmann (ALGCO), Claire Pennarun, (LaBRI)

TL;DR
This paper proves that all planar graphs can be represented as L-intersection graphs and that triangle-free planar graphs can be represented as contact graphs of L, |, and -- shapes, simplifying previous proofs.
Contribution
It establishes that planar graphs are L-intersection graphs and triangle-free planar graphs are {L, |, --}-contact graphs, confirming conjectures from 2013 with a new decomposition method.
Findings
Planar graphs are L-intersection graphs.
Triangle-free planar graphs are {L, |, --}-contact graphs.
Simplifies proof that planar graphs are segment intersection graphs.
Abstract
The L-intersection graphs are the graphs that have a representation as intersection graphs of axis parallel shapes in the plane. A subfamily of these graphs are {L, |, --}-contact graphs which are the contact graphs of axis parallel L, |, and -- shapes in the plane. We prove here two results that were conjectured by Chaplick and Ueckerdt in 2013. We show that planar graphs are L-intersection graphs, and that triangle-free planar graphs are {L, |, --}-contact graphs. These results are obtained by a new and simple decomposition technique for 4-connected triangulations. Our results also provide a much simpler proof of the known fact that planar graphs are segment intersection graphs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
