Positivity of the diagonal
Brian Lehmann, John Christian Ottem

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the positivity properties of the diagonal cycle on a projective variety reflect the variety's geometric features, establishing new links between diagonal positivity and classical geometric invariants.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the conditions under which the diagonal is big, nef, or rigid, and relates these to the vanishing of Hodge groups and classification of low-dimensional varieties.
Findings
Diagonal being big implies vanishing of certain Hodge groups.
Classification results for low-dimensional varieties with nef and big diagonals.
Criteria for the diagonal to be nef, big, or rigid based on geometric properties.
Abstract
We study how the geometry of a projective variety is reflected in the positivity properties of the diagonal considered as a cycle on . We analyze when the diagonal is big, when it is nef, and when it is rigid. In each case, we give several implications for the geometric properties of . For example, when the diagonal is big, we prove that the Hodge groups vanish for . We also classify varieties of low dimension where the diagonal is nef and big.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
