The SAMI Galaxy Survey: Data Release One with Emission-line Physics Value-Added Products
Andrew W. Green (1), Scott M. Croom (2, 3), Nicholas Scott (2),, Luca Cortese (4), Anne M. Medling, (5, 6, 7), Francesco D'Eugenio (3, and 5), Julia J. Bryant (1, 2, 3), Joss Bland-Hawthorn (2), J. T. Allen, (2, 3), Rob Sharp (5), I-Ting Ho (8), Brent Groves (5), Michael J.

TL;DR
The SAMI Galaxy Survey Data Release One provides extensive spatially resolved spectroscopic data for 772 galaxies, enabling detailed studies of emission-line physics across a broad range of galaxy properties.
Contribution
This release offers the first large, publicly available dataset with detailed emission-line maps and improved calibration, advancing galaxy physics research.
Findings
High-quality emission-line maps for 772 galaxies
Enhanced calibration accuracy over previous data releases
Broad galaxy property coverage in mass and star formation rate
Abstract
We present the first major release of data from the SAMI Galaxy Survey. This data release focuses on the emission-line physics of galaxies. Data Release One includes data for 772 galaxies, about 20% of the full survey. Galaxies included have the redshift range 0.004 < z < 0.092, a large mass range (7.6 < log(Mstellar/M) < 11.6), and star-formation rates of 10^-4 to 10^1\ M/yr. For each galaxy, we include two spectral cubes and a set of spatially resolved 2D maps: single- and multi-component emission-line fits (with dust extinction corrections for strong lines), local dust extinction and star-formation rate. Calibration of the fibre throughputs, fluxes and differential-atmospheric-refraction has been improved over the Early Data Release. The data have average spatial resolution of 2.16 arcsec (FWHM) over the 15~arcsec diameter field of view and spectral (kinematic)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
