The optical vs. mid-infrared spectral properties of 82 Type 1 AGNs: coevolution of AGN and starburst
Ma\v{s}a Laki\'cevi\'c, Jelena Kova\v{c}evi\'c-Doj\v{c}inovi\'c and, Luka \v{C}. Popovi\'c

TL;DR
This study explores the relationship between optical and mid-infrared spectral features in 82 Type 1 AGNs, revealing correlations that shed light on the coevolution of AGN activity and starburst phenomena.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of optical and MIR diagnostics for starburst activity in AGNs, highlighting their differences and correlations.
Findings
Increased MIR starburst indicators correlate with higher optical line EWs.
MIR spectral index increase correlates with decreased EW([OIII]).
Weak relation between [OIII]/Hβ ratio and PAH contribution.
Abstract
We investigated the connection between the mid-infrared (MIR) and optical spectral characteristics in a sample of 82 Type 1 active galactic nuclei (AGNs), observed with Infrared Spectrometer on Spitzer (IRS) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, DR12). We found several interesting correlations between optical and MIR spectral properties: i) as starburst significators in MIR increase, the EWs of optical lines HNLR and FeII, increase as well; ii) as MIR spectral index increases, EW([OIII]) decreases, while fractional contribution of AGN (RAGN) is not connected with EW([OIII]); iii) The log([OIII]5007/NLR) ratio is weakly related to the fractional contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (RPAHs). We compare the two different MIR and optical diagnostics for starburst contribution to the overall radiation (RPAH and BPT diagram, respectively). The significant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
