NGC 6819: testing the asteroseismic mass scale, mass loss, and evidence for products of non-standard evolution
R. Handberg, K. Brogaard, A. Miglio, D. Bossini, Y. Elsworth, D., Slumstrup, G. R. Davies, W. J. Chaplin

TL;DR
This study uses asteroseismology on Kepler data of NGC 6819's red giants to test mass scales, assess mass loss, and find evidence of non-standard stellar evolution, with implications for understanding stellar populations.
Contribution
It introduces refined asteroseismic analysis methods and demonstrates their effectiveness in determining stellar evolutionary states and masses, revealing minimal mass loss and evidence of non-standard evolution.
Findings
Mean masses of RGB and RC stars are nearly identical, indicating little mass loss.
Empirical corrections to scaling relations align well with independent distance measures.
Identification of overmassive and undermassive stars suggests complex evolutionary histories.
Abstract
We present an extensive peakbagging effort on Kepler data of 50 red giant stars in the open star cluster NGC 6819. By employing sophisticated pre-processing of the time series and Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques we extracted individual frequencies, heights and linewidths for hundreds of oscillation modes. We show that the "average" asteroseismic parameter , derived from these, can be used to distinguish the stellar evolutionary state between the red giant branch (RGB) stars and red clump (RC) stars. Masses and radii are estimated using asteroseismic scaling relations, both empirically corrected to obtain self-consistency as well as agreement with independent measures of distance, and using updated theoretical corrections. Remarkable agreement is found, allowing the evolutionary state of the giants to be determined exclusively from the empirical correction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
