Cellular covers of local groups
Ramon Flores, Jerome Scherer

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in the category of groups, the composition of cellularization and localization functors can fail to be idempotent, answering a question posed by Emmanuel Dror Farjoun negatively.
Contribution
It shows that the composition of cellularization and localization functors is not necessarily idempotent in the category of groups, providing a counterexample to a longstanding question.
Findings
Composition of cellularization and localization is not always idempotent.
Provides a negative answer to Farjoun's question.
Highlights limitations of functor compositions in group theory.
Abstract
We prove that, in the category of groups, the composition of a cellularization and a localization functor need not be idempotent. This provides a negative answer to a question of Emmanuel Dror Farjoun.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
