Centroid vetting of transiting planet candidates from the Next Generation Transit Survey
Maximilian N. G\"unther, Didier Queloz, Edward Gillen, James McCormac,, Daniel Bayliss, Francois Bouchy, Simon. R. Walker, Richard G. West, Philipp, Eigm\"uller, Alexis M. S. Smith, David J. Armstrong, Matthew Burleigh, Sarah, L. Casewell, Alexander P. Chaushev, Michael R. Goad

TL;DR
This paper introduces a fully-automated centroid vetting algorithm for the NGTS, improving false positive identification in ground-based transit surveys by detecting centroid shifts with high precision, thus enhancing candidate validation efficiency.
Contribution
The paper presents the first ground-based implementation of an automated centroid vetting technique for wide-field transit surveys, integrated into NGTS for improved false positive rejection.
Findings
Centroid shifts can be detected with an average precision of 0.75 milli-pixel.
The algorithm is fully automated and integrated into NGTS.
Ground-based surveys can now effectively use centroiding for candidate vetting.
Abstract
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS), operating in Paranal since 2016, is a wide-field survey to detect Neptunes and super-Earths transiting bright stars, which are suitable for precise radial velocity follow-up and characterisation. Thereby, its sub-mmag photometric precision and ability to identify false positives are crucial. Particularly, variable background objects blended in the photometric aperture frequently mimic Neptune-sized transits and are costly in follow-up time. These objects can best be identified with the centroiding technique: if the photometric flux is lost off-centre during an eclipse, the flux centroid shifts towards the centre of the target star. Although this method has successfully been employed by the Kepler mission, it has previously not been implemented from the ground. We present a fully-automated centroid vetting algorithm developed for NGTS, enabled…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
