Is there a connection between "dark" and "light" physics?
Matthew J. Lake

TL;DR
This paper explores the potential empirical links between cosmological constants and fundamental particle properties, proposing new interpretations that could unify dark and light physics through recent theoretical arguments.
Contribution
It introduces a novel identification of a mass scale related to the cosmological constant, moving beyond numerology towards empirical science.
Findings
Suggests a connection between dark energy and electron properties
Proposes a physical basis for cosmological-atomic physics links
Highlights the potential unification of dark and light physics
Abstract
In the early-mid 20 century Dirac and Zel'dovich were among the first scientists to suggest an intimate connection between cosmology and atomic physics. Though a revolutionary proposal for its time, Dirac's Large Number Hypothesis (1937) adopted a standard assumption of the day, namely, the non-existence of the cosmological constant term (). As a result, its implementation necessitated extreme violence to the theory of general relativity -- something few physicists were prepared to sacrifice in favour of `numerology' -- requiring a time-dependent gravitational coupling of the form . Zel'dovich's insight (1968) was to realise that a small but nonzero cosmological term () allowed the present day radius of the Universe to be identified with the de Sitter radius, , which removed the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
