Larkin-Ovchinnikov state of superconducting Weyl metals: Fundamental differences between pairings restricted and extended in the $\it{\textbf{k}}$-space
Lei Hao, Rui Wang, Pavan Hosur, and C. S. Ting

TL;DR
This paper compares two theoretical approaches to studying the Larkin-Ovchinnikov state in Weyl metals, revealing significant differences in their bulk and surface spectra due to how pairing interactions are modeled in momentum space.
Contribution
It demonstrates how restricting or extending pairing in momentum space affects the topological and spectral properties of Weyl metals, highlighting fundamental differences.
Findings
Different pairing approaches lead to distinct bulk spectra in Weyl metals.
Line nodes are robust in the extended pairing approach for two Weyl pairs.
Surface states and topological features vary significantly between the two methods.
Abstract
Two common approaches of studying theoretically the property of a superconductor are shown to have significant differences, when they are applied to the Larkin-Ovchinnikov state of Weyl metals. In the first approach the pairing term is restricted by a cutoff energy to the neighborhood of the Fermi surface, whereas in the second approach the pairing term is extended to the whole Brillouin zone. We explore their difference by considering two minimal models for the Weyl metal. For a model giving a single pair of Weyl pockets, both two approaches give a partly-gapped (fully-gapped) bulk spectrum for small (large) pairing amplitude. However, for very small cutoff energy, a portion of the Fermi surface can be completely unaffected by the pairing term in the first approach. For the other model giving two pairs of Weyl pockets, while the bulk spectrum for the first approach can be fully gapped,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
