High-precision mass measurement of $^{56}$Cu and the redirection of the rp-process flow
A.A. Valverde, M. Brodeur, G. Bollen, M. Eibach, K. Gulyuz, A., Hamaker, C. Izzo, W.-J. Ong, D. Puentes, M. Redshaw, R. Ringle, R. Sandler,, S. Schwarz, C.S. Sumithrarachchi, J. Surbrook, A.C.C. Vilari, I.T. Yandow

TL;DR
This study precisely measured the mass of $^{56}$Cu, significantly improving accuracy, and demonstrated its impact on the rp-process flow in astrophysical nucleosynthesis, showing a bypass around the $^{56}$Ni waiting point.
Contribution
The paper provides the most precise mass measurement of $^{56}$Cu to date and shows how this measurement alters the understanding of the rp-process flow in astrophysics.
Findings
The new $^{56}$Cu mass value is 30 times more precise than previous estimates.
Reaction network calculations indicate the rp-process bypasses the $^{56}$Ni waiting point.
The flow proceeds more quickly to higher masses, affecting nucleosynthesis outcomes.
Abstract
We report the mass measurement of Cu, using the LEBIT 9.4T Penning trap mass spectrometer at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at Michigan State University. The mass of Cu is critical for constraining the reaction rates of the Ni(p,)Cu(p,)Zn()Cu bypass around the Ni waiting point. Previous recommended mass excess values have disagreed by several hundred keV. Our new value, ME= keV, is a factor of 30 more precise than the suggested value from the 2012 atomic mass evaluation [Chin. Phys. C {\bf{36}}, 1603 (2012)], and more than a factor of 12 more precise than values calculated using local mass extrapolations, while agreeing with the newest 2016 atomic mass evaluation value [Chin. Phys. C {\bf{41}}, 030003 (2017)]. The new experimental average was used to calculate the astrophysical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
