A Dynamic Game Analysis and Design of Infrastructure Network Protection and Recovery
Juntao Chen, Corinne Touati, and Quanyan Zhu

TL;DR
This paper models infrastructure network protection and recovery as a dynamic game between a defender and attacker, deriving optimal strategies and analyzing system resilience through a case study.
Contribution
It introduces a three-stage game framework for infrastructure security, explicitly characterizes subgame perfect equilibrium strategies, and applies the model to UAV communication networks.
Findings
Explicit SPE strategies depend on system parameters
Defense strategies effectively maintain network connectivity
Attacker's optimal link removal strategies are identified
Abstract
Infrastructure networks are vulnerable to both cyber and physical attacks. Building a secure and resilient networked system is essential for providing reliable and dependable services. To this end, we establish a two-player three-stage game framework to capture the dynamics in the infrastructure protection and recovery phases. Specifically, the goal of the infrastructure network designer is to keep the network connected before and after the attack, while the adversary aims to disconnect the network by compromising a set of links. With costs for creating and removing links, the two players aim to maximize their utilities while minimizing the costs. In this paper, we use the concept of subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) to characterize the optimal strategies of the network defender and attacker. We derive the SPE explicitly in terms of system parameters. Finally, we use a case study of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
