Well-closed subschemes of noncommutative schemes
Daniel Rogalski

TL;DR
This paper explores the concept of well-closed subcategories in noncommutative geometry, providing characterizations and applications to points in quasi-schemes, with the aim of defining noncommutative blowups.
Contribution
It characterizes well-closed subcategories via projective effacements and describes the associated functor explicitly, advancing the theory of noncommutative blowups.
Findings
Well-closedness characterized by projective effacements
Explicit description of the functor F in terms of effacements
Closed points are well-closed in general quasi-schemes
Abstract
Van den Bergh has defined the blowup of a noncommutative surface at a point lying on a commutative divisor. We study one aspect of the construction, with an eventual aim of defining more general kinds of noncommutative blowups. Our basic object of study is a quasi-scheme X (a Grothendieck category). Given a closed subcategory Z, in order to define a blowup of X along Z one first needs to have a functor F which is an analog of tensoring with the defining ideal of Z. Following Van den Bergh, a closed subcategory Z which has such a functor is called well-closed. We show that well-closedness can be characterized by the existence of certain projective effacements for each object of X, and that the needed functor F has an explicit description in terms of such effacements. As an application, we prove that closed points are well-closed in quite general quasi-schemes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
