Magnetic Inflation and Stellar Mass I: Revised Parameters for the Component Stars of the Kepler Low-mass Eclipsing Binary T-Cyg1-12664
Eunkyu Han, Philip S. Muirhead, Jonathan J. Swift, Christoph Baranec,, Nicholas M. Law, Reed Riddle, Dani Atkinson, Gregory N. Mace, and Daniel, DeFelippis

TL;DR
This study revises the stellar parameters of the low-mass eclipsing binary T-Cyg1-12664, showing that neither star's radius is inflated, aligning with modern models and challenging previous magnetic inhibition explanations.
Contribution
The paper provides independent mass and radius measurements for T-Cyg1-12664's components, resolving previous discrepancies and supporting standard stellar models for low-mass stars.
Findings
Neither star shows radius inflation compared to models.
Results align with modern stellar evolutionary models.
Magnetic inhibition is not required to explain stellar radii.
Abstract
Several low-mass eclipsing binary stars show larger than expected radii for their measured mass, metallicity and age. One proposed mechanism for this radius inflation involves inhibited internal convection and starspots caused by strong magnetic fields. One particular eclipsing binary, T-Cyg1-12664, has proven confounding to this scenario. \citet{Cakirli2013a} measured a radius for the secondary component that is twice as large as model predictions for stars with the same mass and age, but a primary mass that is consistent with predictions. \citet[][]{Iglesias2017} independently measured the radii and masses of the component stars and found that the radius of the secondary is not in fact inflated with respect to models, but that the primary is, consistent with the inhibited convection scenario. However, in their mass determinations, \citet[][]{Iglesias2017} lacked independent radial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
