Reanalysis of the BICEP2, Keck and Planck Data: No Evidence for Gravitational Radiation
J. Richard Gott III (Princeton University), Wesley N. Colley, (University of Alabama in Huntsville)

TL;DR
A reanalysis of BICEP2, Keck, and Planck data shows no significant evidence for primordial gravitational waves, suggesting previous signals were likely due to noise rather than inflationary gravitational radiation.
Contribution
This study introduces a correlation-based noise estimation method that revises the tensor-to-scalar ratio to near zero, challenging prior claims of detection.
Findings
No evidence for gravitational waves (r ≈ 0) in the data.
Noise in BICEP2 map is twice the original estimate.
Inflationary gravitational waves are not confirmed by this analysis.
Abstract
A joint analysis of data collected by the Planck and BICEP2+Keck teams has previously given for BICEP2 and for Keck. Analyzing BICEP2 using its published noise estimate, we had earlier (Colley & Gott 2015) found , agreeing with the final joint results for BICEP2. With the Keck data now available, we have done something the joint analysis did not: a correlation study of the BICEP2 vs. Keck B-mode maps. Knowing the correlation coefficient between the two and their amplitudes allows us to determine the noise in each map (which we check using the E-modes). We find the noise power in the BICEP2 map to be twice the original BICEP2 published estimate, explaining the anomalously high value obtained by BICEP2. We now find for BICEP2 and for Keck. Since by definition,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
