
TL;DR
This paper explores the fundamental limits of machine consciousness, arguing that subjective awareness is non-computable and discussing the implications of quantum mechanics and cognitive science on consciousness.
Contribution
It introduces a distinction between little-C and big-C consciousness and analyzes how quantum effects influence the potential for machine consciousness.
Findings
Subjective awareness is non-computable.
Consciousness may be more than an epiphenomenon.
Quantum effects impact the limits of machine consciousness.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that machines can replicate cognitive tasks performed by conscious agents as long as they are not based on the capacity of awareness. We consider several views on the nature of subjective awareness, which is fundamental for self-reflection and review, and present reasons why this property is not computable. We argue that consciousness is more than an epiphenomenon and assuming it to be a separate category is consistent with both quantum mechanics and cognitive science. We speak of two kinds of consciousness, little-C and big-C, and discuss the significance of this classification in analyzing the current academic debates in the field. The interaction between the system and the measuring apparatus of the experimenter is examined both from the perspectives of decoherence and the quantum Zeno effect. These ideas are used as context to address the question of limits…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
