Measurements of multiparticle correlations in $d$$+$Au collisions at 200, 62.4, 39, and 19.6 GeV and $p$$+$Au collisions at 200 GeV and implications for collective behavior
C. Aidala, Y. Akiba, M. Alfred, V. Andrieux, K. Aoki, N. Apadula, H., Asano, C. Ayuso, B. Azmoun, V. Babintsev, A. Bagoly, N.S. Bandara, K.N., Barish, S. Bathe, A. Bazilevsky, M. Beaumier, R. Belmont, A. Berdnikov, Y., Berdnikov, D.S. Blau, M. Boer, J.S. Bok, M.L. Brooks

TL;DR
This study measures multiparticle correlations in $d$+Au and $p$+Au collisions across various energies, revealing signs of collective behavior and geometrical origins of correlations, with implications for understanding the quark-gluon plasma.
Contribution
It provides the first beam-energy-scan measurements of multiparticle correlations in $d$+Au collisions and compares them with $p$+Au results, highlighting the collective nature of observed correlations.
Findings
4-particle cumulant is real-valued at all energies in $d$+Au
Opposite sign of 4-particle cumulant in $p$+Au vs. $d$+Au indicates geometrical collectivity
6-particle cumulant agrees with 4-particle in $d$+Au at 200 GeV, suggesting minimal nonflow effects
Abstract
Recently, multiparticle-correlation measurements of relativistic HeAu, Pb, and even collisions have shown surprising collective signatures. Here we present beam-energy-scan measurements of 2-, 4-, and 6-particle angular correlations in Au collisions at =200, 62.4, 39, and 19.6 GeV. We also present measurements of 2- and 4-particle angular correlations in Au collisions at =200 GeV. We find the 4-particle cumulant to be real-valued for Au collisions at all four energies. We also find that the 4-particle cumulant in Au has the opposite sign as that in Au, indicating that the correlations are geometrical and therefore collective in origin. Further we find that the 6-particle cumulant agrees with the 4-particle cumulant in Au collisions at 200 GeV, which indicates that nonflow effects are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
