Andromeda's Parachute: A Bright Quadruply Lensed Quasar at z=2.377
Kate H. R. Rubin (1), John M. O'Meara (2), Kathy L. Cooksey (3),, Mateusz Matuszewski (4), Luca Rizzi (5), Gregory W. Doppmann (5), Shui Hung, Kwok (5), D. Christopher Martin (4), Anna M. Moore (6), Patrick Morrissey, (4), James D. Neill (4) ((1) SDSU, (2) St. Michael's College

TL;DR
This paper confirms J014709+463037 as a quadruply lensed quasar at z=2.377, analyzing intervening absorption systems across multiple sight lines to study the spatial coherence of metal-line absorbers.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed spatially-resolved analysis of metal-line absorption variability in a high-redshift quadruply lensed quasar.
Findings
MgII-absorbing material shows high spatial coherence over 7-21 kpc scales.
Significant variation in CIV absorption occurs over <3 kpc.
The system's brightness and separation make it ideal for future high-resolution studies.
Abstract
We present Keck Cosmic Web Imager spectroscopy of the four putative images of the lensed quasar candidate J014709+463037 recently discovered by Berghea et al. (2017). The data verify the source as a quadruply lensed, broad absorption-line quasar having z_S = 2.377 +/- 0.007. We detect intervening absorption in the FeII 2586, 2600, MgII 2796, 2803, and/or CIV 1548, 1550 transitions in eight foreground systems, three of which have redshifts consistent with the photometric-redshift estimate reported for the lensing galaxy (z_L ~ 0.57). By virtue of their positions on the sky, the source images probe these absorbers over transverse physical scales of ~0.3-21 kpc, permitting assessment of the variation in metal-line equivalent width W_r as a function of sight-line separation. We measure differences in W_r,2796 of <40% across all sight-line pairs subtending 7-21 kpc, suggestive of a high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
