Certification and Quantification of Multilevel Quantum Coherence
Martin Ringbauer, Thomas R. Bromley, Marco Cianciaruso, Ludovico Lami,, W. Y. Sarah Lau, Gerardo Adesso, Andrew G. White, Alessandro Fedrizzi, Marco, Piani

TL;DR
This paper develops methods to characterize and quantify multilevel quantum coherence, demonstrating its importance in quantum communication and metrology through theoretical analysis and experimental validation.
Contribution
It introduces a complete analytical criterion for multilevel coherence, a quantifier called robustness, and demonstrates experimental verification using photonic systems.
Findings
Multilevel coherence requires a certain purity level in quantum states.
A simple criterion for verifying multilevel coherence in three-level systems.
Experimental lower bounds on multilevel coherence using phase discrimination tasks.
Abstract
Quantum coherence, present whenever a quantum system exists in a superposition of multiple classically distinct states, marks one of the fundamental departures from classical physics. Quantum coherence has recently been investigated rigorously within a resource-theoretic formalism. However, the finer-grained notion of multilevel coherence, which explicitly takes into account the number of superposed classical states, has remained relatively unexplored. A comprehensive analysis of multi-level coherence, which acts as the single-party analogue to multi-partite entanglement, is essential for understanding natural quantum processes as well as for gauging the performance of quantum technologies. Here we develop the theoretical and experimental groundwork for characterizing and quantifying multilevel coherence. We prove that non-trivial levels of purity are required for multilevel coherence,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
