Good signals gone bad: dynamic signalling with switching efforts
Sander Heinsalu

TL;DR
This paper explores dynamic signalling where senders exert effort over time with noisy signals, revealing novel equilibrium behaviors such as effort switching and endogenous signal interpretation based on type expectations.
Contribution
It introduces a dynamic model of signalling with switching efforts and endogenous signal interpretation, uncovering new equilibrium outcomes not seen in static models.
Findings
High-cost senders exert more effort than low-cost ones in some equilibria.
Low-cost types can compensate for initial low effort later, high-cost types cannot.
Signal interpretation varies over time depending on receiver expectations.
Abstract
This paper examines signalling when the sender exerts effort and receives benefits over time. Receivers only observe a noisy public signal about the effort, which has no intrinsic value. The modelling of signalling in a dynamic context gives rise to novel equilibrium outcomes. In some equilibria, a sender with a higher cost of effort exerts strictly more effort than his low-cost counterpart. The low-cost type can compensate later for initial low effort, but this is not worthwhile for a high-cost type. The interpretation of a given signal switches endogenously over time, depending on which type the receivers expect to send it. JEL classification: D82, D83, C73. Keywords: Dynamic games, signalling , incomplete information
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Auction Theory and Applications · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
