Coexistence of critical sensitivity and subcritical specificity can yield optimal population coding
Leonardo L. Gollo

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a heterogeneous system with both critical and subcritical components can optimize population coding by balancing sensitivity and specificity, outperforming systems that are entirely critical.
Contribution
It introduces a model where critical and subcritical elements coexist, showing this arrangement maximizes the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity in population coding.
Findings
Critical components provide optimal sensitivity.
Subcritical components enhance response specificity.
Mixed systems outperform fully critical systems in coding performance.
Abstract
The vicinity of phase transitions selectively amplifies weak stimuli, yielding optimal sensitivity to distinguish external input. Along with this enhanced sensitivity, enhanced levels of fluctuations at criticality reduce the specificity of the response. Given that the specificity of the response is largely compromised when the sensitivity is maximal, the overall benefit of criticality for signal processing remains questionable. Here it is shown that this impasse can be solved by heterogeneous systems incorporating functional diversity, in which critical and subcritical components coexist. The subnetwork of critical elements has optimal sensitivity, and the subnetwork of subcritical elements has enhanced specificity. Combining segregated features extracted from the different subgroups, the resulting collective response can maximise the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
