Armstrong's Axioms and Navigation Strategies
Kaya Deuser, Pavel Naumov

TL;DR
This paper explores how navigability under imperfect information can be characterized logically, extending Armstrong's axioms from database theory to account for scenarios lacking perfect recall.
Contribution
It establishes soundness and completeness theorems for logical systems describing navigability with and without perfect recall, introducing weaker principles when perfect recall is absent.
Findings
Armstrong's axioms characterize navigability with perfect recall.
Without perfect recall, Armstrong's transitivity is invalid but can be replaced.
Logical systems are sound and complete for both scenarios.
Abstract
The paper investigates navigability with imperfect information. It shows that the properties of navigability with perfect recall are exactly those captured by Armstrong's axioms from the database theory. If the assumption of perfect recall is omitted, then Armstrong's transitivity axiom is not valid, but it can be replaced by two new weaker principles. The main technical results are soundness and completeness theorems for the logical systems describing properties of navigability with and without perfect recall.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Data Management and Algorithms · Semantic Web and Ontologies
