KiDS-i-800: Comparing weak gravitational lensing measurements in same-sky surveys
A. Amon, C. Heymans, D. Klaes, T. Erben, C. Blake, H. Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, K. Kuijken, L. Miller, C.B. Morrison, A. Choi, J.T.A. de Jong, K., Glazebrook, N. Irissari, B. Joachimi, S. Joudaki, A. Kannawadi, C. Lidman, N., Napolitano, D. Parkinson, P. Schneider

TL;DR
This study compares weak gravitational lensing measurements from two overlapping KiDS surveys in different bands, introducing null tests to verify measurement consistency across varying observing conditions and redshift calibrations.
Contribution
The paper presents new null tests for assessing the robustness of weak lensing measurements across different survey bands and observing conditions.
Findings
Shear measurements agree within 4% between the two bands.
Galaxy-galaxy lensing signals agree within 7% after redshift calibration.
Null tests confirm measurement consistency despite different observing conditions.
Abstract
We present a weak gravitational lensing analysis of 815 square degree of -band imaging from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS--800). In contrast to the deep -band observations, which take priority during excellent seeing conditions and form the primary KiDS dataset (KiDS--450), the complementary yet shallower KiDS--800 spans a wide range of observing conditions. The overlapping KiDS--800 and KiDS--450 imaging therefore provides a unique opportunity to assess the robustness of weak lensing measurements. In our analysis, we introduce two new `null' tests. The `nulled' two-point shear correlation function uses a matched catalogue to show that the calibrated KiDS--800 and KiDS--450 shear measurements agree at the level of \%. We use five galaxy lens samples to determine a `nulled' galaxy-galaxy lensing signal from the full KiDS--800 and KiDS--450 surveys…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
