Thickness dependence of spin-orbit torques generated by WTe2
David MacNeill, Gregory M. Stiehl, Marcos H. D. Guimaraes, Neal D., Reynolds, Robert A. Buhrman, Daniel C. Ralph

TL;DR
This study investigates how the thickness of WTe2 affects the spin-orbit torques generated in WTe2/permalloy bilayers, revealing a robust out-of-plane antidamping torque even in monolayer samples and clarifying the origin of the field-like torque.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of thickness-dependent spin-orbit torques in WTe2, including the sign reversal of the antidamping torque at a monolayer step and the origin of the field-like torque.
Findings
Out-of-plane antidamping torque exists and reverses sign at monolayer step.
Even monolayer WTe2 generates a strong, comparable torque to thicker samples.
Field-like torque mainly originates from the Oersted field.
Abstract
We study current-induced torques in WTe2/permalloy bilayers as a function of WTe2 thickness. We measure the torques using both second-harmonic Hall and spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance measurements for samples with WTe2 thicknesses that span from 16 nm down to a single monolayer. We confirm the existence of an out-of-plane antidamping torque, and show directly that the sign of this torque component is reversed across a monolayer step in the WTe2. The magnitude of the out-of-plane antidamping torque depends only weakly on WTe2 thickness, such that even a single-monolayer WTe2 device provides a strong torque that is comparable to much thicker samples. In contrast, the out-of-plane field-like torque has a significant dependence on the WTe2 thickness. We demonstrate that this field-like component originates predominantly from the Oersted field, thereby correcting a previous inference…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
