Galaxy properties from J-PAS narrow-band photometry
A. Mej\'ia-Narv\'aez, G. Bruzual, G. Magris C., J. S. Alcaniz, N., Ben\'itez, S. Carneiro, A. J. Cenarro, D. Crist\'obal-Hornillos, R. Dupke, A., Ederoclite, A. Mar\'in-Franch, C. Mendes de Oliveira, M. Moles, L. Sodre Jr.,, K. Taylor, J. Varela, and H. V\'azquez Rami\'o

TL;DR
This study compares galaxy property estimations from narrow-band photometry and high-resolution spectroscopy, finding that narrow-band data provides similar trends but with less precision, and highlighting biases in Bayesian analysis methods.
Contribution
It demonstrates that narrow-band photometry can reliably recover galaxy properties with comparable trends to spectroscopy, while analyzing biases introduced by prior assumptions in Bayesian SED fitting.
Findings
Narrow-band photometry yields similar galaxy property trends as spectroscopy.
Spectroscopy provides approximately twice the precision of narrow-band photometry.
Prior PDFs in Bayesian methods can introduce biases not accounted for in the analysis.
Abstract
We study the consistency of the physical properties of galaxies retrieved from SED-fitting as a function of spectral resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Using a selection of physically motivated star formation histories, we set up a control sample of mock galaxy spectra representing observations of the local universe in high-resolution spectroscopy, and in 56 narrow-band and 5 broad-band photometry. We fit the SEDs at these spectral resolutions and compute their corresponding the stellar mass, the mass- and luminosity-weighted age and metallicity, and the dust extinction. We study the biases, correlations, and degeneracies affecting the retrieved parameters and explore the r\^ole of the spectral resolution and the SNR in regulating these degeneracies. We find that narrow-band photometry and spectroscopy yield similar trends in the physical properties derived, the former being…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
