A second-order orientation-contrast stimulus for population-receptive-field-based retinotopic mapping
Funda Yildirim, Joana Carvalho, Frans W. Cornelissen

TL;DR
This study introduces a novel orientation contrast-based retinotopic mapping method that selectively targets specific neural populations, leading to more precise pRF localization and reduced receptive field sizes in higher visual areas.
Contribution
The paper presents a second-order orientation contrast stimulus for retinotopic mapping, improving specificity and accuracy over traditional luminance contrast methods.
Findings
Reduced pRF size estimates by around 30% in higher visual areas.
Potential for more accurate localization of receptive fields.
Selective targeting of neuronal populations enhances pRF analysis.
Abstract
Visual field or retinotopic mapping is one of the most frequently used paradigms in fMRI. It uses activity evoked by position-varying high luminance contrast visual patterns presented throughout the visual field for determining the spatial organization of cortical visual areas. While the advantage of using high luminance contrast is that it tends to drive a wide range of neural populations - thus resulting in high signal-to-noise BOLD responses - this may also be a limitation, especially for approaches that attempt to squeeze more information out of the BOLD response, such as population receptive field (pRF) mapping. In that case, more selective stimulation of a subset of neurons - despite reduced signals - could result in better characterization of pRF properties. Here, we used a second-order stimulus based on local differences in orientation texture - to which we refer as orientation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
