Galileon Gravity in Light of ISW, CMB, BAO and $H_0$ data
Janina Renk, Miguel Zumalac\'arregui, Francesco Montanari, Alexandre, Barreira

TL;DR
This study tests Galileon gravity models against cosmological data, finding the cubic model incompatible with observations, while quartic and quintic models remain viable and consistent with some local measurements.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive constraints on the full parameter space of Galileon gravity models using CMB, BAO, and ISW data, including the cross-correlation analysis.
Findings
Cubic Galileon model is ruled out by ISW data.
Quartic and quintic models fit data well with some parameter restrictions.
Galileon models favor a higher neutrino mass sum (~0.5 eV).
Abstract
Cosmological models with Galileon gravity are an alternative to the standard paradigm with testable predictions at the level of its self-accelerating solutions for the expansion history, as well as large-scale structure formation. Here, we place constraints on the full parameter space of these models using data from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) (including lensing), baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect. We pay special attention to the ISW effect for which we use the cross-spectra, , of CMB temperature maps and foreground galaxies from the WISE survey. The sign of is set by the time evolution of the lensing potential in the redshift range of the galaxy sample: it is positive if the potential decays (like in ), negative if it deepens. We constrain three subsets…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
