Coherent combination of probabilistic outputs for group decision making: an algebraic approach
Manuele Leonelli, Eva Riccomagno, Jim Q. Smith

TL;DR
This paper introduces an algebraic method for combining probabilistic outputs from multiple expert panels in decision support systems, ensuring coherence and enabling efficient Bayesian multi-agent analysis across diverse models.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel algebraic framework that generalizes the combination of expert judgments in Bayesian decision analysis, allowing for partial model sharing and closed-form computations.
Findings
The approach guarantees coherence even with partial model sharing.
Closed-form formulas for joint moments in Bayesian networks are derived.
The method enhances computational efficiency in multi-agent decision systems.
Abstract
Current decision support systems address domains that are heterogeneous in nature and becoming progressively larger. Such systems often require the input of expert judgement about a variety of different fields and an intensive computational power to produce the scores necessary to rank the available policies. Recently, integrating decision support systems have been introduced to enable a formal Bayesian multi-agent decision analysis to be distributed and consequently efficient. In such systems, where different panels of experts oversee disjoint but correlated vectors of variables, each expert group needs to deliver only certain summaries of the variables under their jurisdiction to properly derive an overall score for the available policies. Here we present an algebraic approach that makes this methodology feasible for a wide range of modelling contexts and that enables us to identify…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
