Is QBism the Future of Quantum Physics?

TL;DR

This paper critically examines QBism, an interpretation of quantum mechanics, questioning its claims to resolve paradoxes and its clarity, while acknowledging its insightful contributions.

Contribution

It provides a critical analysis of QBism's claims, highlighting its limitations in resolving quantum paradoxes and clarifying its interpretations.

Findings

QBism does not convincingly solve quantum paradoxes

Difficulty in precisely defining QBism's claims

QBism appears explanatorily inert as a scientific theory

Abstract

The purpose of this book is to explain Quantum Bayesianism ('QBism') to "people without easy access to mathematical formulas and equations" (4-5). Qbism is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that "doesn't meddle with the technical aspects of the theory [but instead] reinterprets the fundamental terms of the theory and gives them new meaning" (3). The most important motivation for QBism, enthusiastically stated on the book's cover, is that QBism provides "a way past quantum theory's paradoxes and puzzles" such that much of the weirdness associated with quantum theory "dissolves under the lens of QBism". Could a non-technical book that almost fits in your pocket really succeed in resolving the notorious paradoxes of quantum theory? I believe the answer is: not in this case. There are three primary reasons. Firstly, the argument that QBism solves quantum paradoxes is not convincing. Secondly, it proves difficult to pin down exactly what QBism says. Thirdly, as a scientific theory QBism seems explanatorily inert, which is maybe why the topic of scientific explanation is not broached. Sections 2-4 below discuss each of these problems in turn. However, there is still a wealth of insights that make this book a worthwhile read, and I shall begin with those.