Common Counterfactual Belief of Rationality Subsumes Superrationality On Symmetric Games
Ghislain Fourny

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in symmetric games, strategies deemed superrational are also rational under common counterfactual beliefs, unifying two concepts in game theory.
Contribution
It establishes that superrational strategies in symmetric games are encompassed by rationality criteria based on common counterfactual beliefs, linking two theoretical frameworks.
Findings
Superrational strategies satisfy minimax-rationalizability.
Superrational strategies satisfy individual rationality.
The unification applies specifically to symmetric games.
Abstract
This paper shows that, for symmetric games in normal form, strategy profiles that satisfy Hofstadter's Superrationality criterion also satisfy both of Halpern's and Pass's criteria under Common Counterfactual Belief of Rationality: minimax-rationalizability and individual rationality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
